Babies analogous to Patio Heaters
Blogged by James Preece on 27th July 2008
Population scaremongery is back...
The Optimum Population Trust calculates that “each new UK birth will be responsible for 160 times more greenhouse gas emissions . . . than a new birth in Ethiopia." Should UK doctors break a deafening silence here? “Population” and “family planning” seem taboo words ... isn’t contraception the medical profession’s prime contribution for all countries?
Unplanned pregnancy, especially in teenagers, is a problem for the planet, as well as the individual concerned. But what about planned pregnancies? Should we now explain to UK couples who plan a family that stopping at two children, or at least having one less child than first intended, is the simplest and biggest contribution anyone can make to leaving a habitable planet for our grandchildren? We must not put pressure on people, but by providing information on the population and the environment, and appropriate contraception for everyone (and by their own example), doctors should help to bring family size into the arena of environmental ethics, analogous to avoiding patio heaters and high carbon cars.
[link]
What these idiots fail to realise is that having a child pretty much writes off ever being able to buy a patio heater or a high carbon car.
The Catholic Church has long been striving to reduce the carbon footprint of the human race by famously refusing to allow it's priests to procreate.
If the Optimum Population Trust really want to reduce the carbon footprint of the human race, then I will gladly write to them every time I have a child and one of them can heroically save the planet by jumping out of a window.
















