|
God so loved the world that he gave his only son... |
The UNOFFICIAL Website of the Papal Visit |
The Last Crusade
Blogged by James Preece on 15th July 2009
I'm sure you're all familiar with the Indiana Jones movies, if you're not then you need to stop wasting your time on the internet and get down to a video shop immediately... Okay... The third Indiana Jones film is the Last Crusade and there is a scene at the end of the film when Indy and chums have located the legendary Holy Grail which has the power to give eternal life.
There is a catch. The grail is hidden among many other cups and chalices and a decision must be made about which cup is the true grail. Pick the correct cup and be rewarded with eternal life but pick the wrong cup and die horribly.
The first person to take a guess is the villainous Nazi... he must be some kind of traditionalist because he picks the biggest, goldest, cup he can lay his hands on...

He guesses wrong and if I remember correctly he dies of old age very rapidly (it's very cool). His mistake, it is explained, is that he chose the expensive looking cup. Our hero, Indiana Jones, selects a simple cup. He chooses correctly and is able to save Sean Connery from certain death...

The lesson is simple... Nice chalices (as favoured by traditionalists) lead to death, while plain chalices (as favoured by heroes) lead to life. In 1989 when that film came out it was obviously seen by quite a few liturgists who took the lesson quite literally and as a result our Churches are littered with earthenware communion bowls. Stephen Spielberg has a lot to answer for...
In 2004 the Vatican decided to set the record straight. Redemptionis Sacramentum says that Sacred vessels for containing the Body and Blood of the Lord are to be made from materials which are "truly noble in the common estimation within a given region" so that "honour will be given to the Lord by their use, and all risk of diminishing the doctrine of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharistic species in the eyes of the faithful will be avoided."
Just in case that's a bit subtle, they spell it out:
Reprobated, therefore, is any practice of using for the celebration of Mass common vessels, or others lacking in quality, or devoid of all artistic merit or which are mere containers, as also other vessels made from glass, earthenware, clay, or other materials that break easily. This norm is to be applied even as regards metals and other materials that easily rust or deteriorate.
It's good to see that Bishop Drainey takes this very seriously, last year he visited the parish down the road where they regularly make use of a ceramic chalice. After he left he sent a letter to the parish priest in which he said:
...a new set of chalices might be in order to enhance and add even more dignity to the liturgy.
[link]
That was last November, I remember reading it at the time and thinking how exciting it was that Bishop was willing to take these things seriously. It might be nice if he would make this particular rule sound less like an optional extra "might be in order". No suprise then that eight months later there are no new chalices and the ceramic ones are still in use.
Hey! Perhaps we should write to the Bishop?
Ah yes... The Bishop...

That photo was taken last August, you can clearly see on the altar the Diocesan Earthenware Bowl Collection. These turn up at every big Diocesan Event and for all I know are used in the Cathedral all the time. Why is Bishop Drainey using them? Why doesn't he say something?
At the time it was pointed out to me that he had been Bishop for less than a year, perhaps there had not been time to do anything about it? Perhaps he was working on it?
Perhaps... So let's fast forward a bit to this July, almost a year later, let's see how he's getting on...

A year later and the same earthenware vessles are still in use... how long does it take to smash a few pots?
I am put in mind of the recent comments by the Bishop of Lancaster...
"I suppose if priests see bishops showing disloyalty to the Pope, it is hardly surprising that they in turn should show disloyalty to their bishop. We all know what Jesus said about a divided house."
[link]
How long must we wait in vain?
Credit and Disclaimer: The above photos of Bishop Drainey were both taken from Middlesbrough Diocese Website. I mention this to credit the source but also to counter any suggestion that it was I that put these things on the internet. There is nothing in this blog entry that was not on the internet already.

















Reader Comments
Hestor said...
Do you really think if the former Msgr. Drainey was obedient to the Pope, that the English conference of bishops would have elected him as a bishop?!
Gimme a break!
Seems the ghost of Crowley still haunts Middlesbrough.
+-
Mac McLernon said...
The trouble with pottery chalices, as Fr. Tim has often remarked to me, is that one or two taps of a hammer and they just fall apart...
+-
Rich said...
The lesson is simple... Nice chalices (as favoured by traditionalists) lead to death
James, a little more explanation of this sentence please. I dont want to misinterpret anything here!
+-
James said...
The explanation is that I'm describing the apparent lesson to be found in Indiana Jones and not my own view which hopefully is apparent by my clear rejection of clay based communion bowls further down...
+-
peter said...
Why do you find it necessary to constantly attack your Bishop? There are more important issues in the Church and indeed the world to look at as we all know
+-
Mark Dobson said...
I think James probably won't mind if I preempt him by saying it's probably because "if priests see bishops showing disloyalty to the Pope, it is hardly surprising that they in turn should show disloyalty to their bishop. We all know what Jesus said about a divided house."
We also know what he said about people that can be trusted with small things. One of the marvellous things about Catholicism is that it all points in the same direction, and even the small things are significant, no matter how little (or much as the case may be) we care about them.
+-
peter said...
Yeah true I really hate those Mouseman pews we have in some churches, hate them with a passion. I think we should organise and campaign against these things so we can have furniture with no animals on them- are we pagans? Lets take the matter to Rome in fact, afterall the small things are significant(!)
+-
James said...
Wow.
I've seen the light!
Thank you Peter.
I realise now that there is no such thing as "good" or "right" and that there is only my personal preference which I am arbitarily trying to impose on other people.
Hold on a second...
If there's no such thing as "good" or "right" why shouldn't I try to impose my preferences on other people?
+-
Mark said...
You don't feel then that this is a rather childish response?
Of course, you can legitimately disagree with me, but I'm not sure you're doing yourself any favours with this ludicrous caricature of people who think differently from yourself.
+-
Mark Dobson said...
Addendum: I mean, can you really not see the difference between liturgical practises that have been ruled out by the Church at an international level and someone's personal preferences?
+-
Hestor said...
Now do you see what the "traditionalists" meant by neo-conservative?
+-